Rejected Ban for Er1.7 | Frost Vukovic By Hermes

[Louis Silva]

Good afternoon, I was banned yesterday because of a POV request where I did in fact upload the POV. The admin asked me for the POV even after I had already uploaded it, and I went back again to say that I had indeed already uploaded the POV.

A friend of mine is telling me that I may have been banned because the POV was too short, but the POV did in fact show the entire incident. Below I am attaching a longer POV to show that everything necessary was already included in that clip.

I think that at the very least they could have told me that the POV was not sufficient, although from my perspective it was because it was only a single shot to guy climbing a stare.

Watch Grand Theft Auto V 2026.05.07 - 17.50.31.12 - Trim | Streamable

Watch "Grand Theft Auto V 2026.05.07 - 17.50.31.12 - Trim" on Streamable.

streamable.com

 

[Louis Silva]

You already got banned for the short POV, I think they'll unban you if you post the full version.

I did now longer pov. There is nothing extra unless juicing and be roaming around a roof. Thats why i didnt think it was necessary for that situation, thats a proper pov for what happened. I saw a guy inside the circle and i shot him and i keep roaming at the roof.

 

[Louis Silva]

Close this thread please. I inserted wrong proofs

 

[Adham Pluxury]

Closed​