- Joined
- Mar 8, 2026
- Messages
- 16
The situation is that my friends and I were doing a panel raid. One of the players who was defending the panels filed an RDM report against me on the forums. The report was reviewed by Okeanos and rejected based on the evidence provided. However, later, Prashant Knight reviewed the exact same evidence, accepted the report, and punished me with a warning and 180 minutes of jail time.
I would also like to add that there was only about one minute left on the panels. The player approached us at very close range while attempting to take back the panels, and we killed him because he was actively contesting the objective. As I mentioned, Okeanos considered the evidence insufficient for punishment and rejected the report, while Prashant Knight later approved the same forum report based on the same evidence. I would like clarification on why the same situation and proof resulted in two different decisions.
I would also like to add that there was only about one minute left on the panels. The player approached us at very close range while attempting to take back the panels, and we killed him because he was actively contesting the objective. As I mentioned, Okeanos considered the evidence insufficient for punishment and rejected the report, while Prashant Knight later approved the same forum report based on the same evidence. I would like clarification on why the same situation and proof resulted in two different decisions.
