- Joined
- Apr 14, 2025
- Messages
- 11
I accept the punishment issued to me for MG and am not appealing that part of the decision.
However, I believe the decision regarding ID 250998 should be re-viewed. In the evidence, the player first says "fuck you MF" and then repeatedly says ("madarchod") multiple times after killing me while standing near my body.
You can clearly hear this in the video at approximately 0:30, where the player repeatedly says "madarchod" multiple times.
The administrator's response mentions that "MF is slang," but my concern is the repeated use of "madarchod." In Hindi, this is a direct insult involving a player's mother and, in my understanding, should fall under GR 3.2 rather than being classified solely as FL in RP.
If possible, I would appreciate the evidence being reviewed by an Indian administrator familiar with Hindi, as the meaning and severity of the word may be better understood in its native context.
I respectfully request a re-review of the evidence and clarification as to why the repeated use of "madarchod" was not considered a GR 3.2 violation.
Complaint Link: Approved - GR 3.1 + GR 3.2 | 250998
However, I believe the decision regarding ID 250998 should be re-viewed. In the evidence, the player first says "fuck you MF" and then repeatedly says ("madarchod") multiple times after killing me while standing near my body.
You can clearly hear this in the video at approximately 0:30, where the player repeatedly says "madarchod" multiple times.
The administrator's response mentions that "MF is slang," but my concern is the repeated use of "madarchod." In Hindi, this is a direct insult involving a player's mother and, in my understanding, should fall under GR 3.2 rather than being classified solely as FL in RP.
If possible, I would appreciate the evidence being reviewed by an Indian administrator familiar with Hindi, as the meaning and severity of the word may be better understood in its native context.
I respectfully request a re-review of the evidence and clarification as to why the repeated use of "madarchod" was not considered a GR 3.2 violation.
Complaint Link: Approved - GR 3.1 + GR 3.2 | 250998
