- Joined
- Dec 28, 2025
- Messages
- 79
How was this report accepted in the first place?
The video evidence is edited. As you can see, when his friend approached me and gave me 5 seconds to leave, if you carefully watch the video, you will notice that the footage freezes completely and then resumes later, after I had already moved away to prepare myself for a possible fight. This means that parts of the video were cut or modified, which should not be allowed. Therefore, the video evidence is not complete and should not be considered valid.
I would also like to point out that the player was holding a weapon in his hands and appeared ready to engage in combat with me. During the incident, I killed him, while his second friend ran to their family house. There was also a third person with them, but I did not shoot him at all because he was not involved when they gave me the 5-second warning.
Furthermore, I still do not understand the reason for giving me 5 seconds to leave. I was not creating any danger or threat to them, and there was no valid reason for such a demand.
For these reasons, I respectfully ask a senior administrator to review this situation carefully. From what I can see, there are several issues with this report, including the apparent editing of the video evidence. Because of this, I believe the report should not have been accepted, yet it was somehow approved.
Thank you for taking the time to read my message. If I made any mistake during this situation, I would appreciate it if you could explain what rule I broke so that I can understand it better in the future.
I wish you all a great day.
The video evidence is edited. As you can see, when his friend approached me and gave me 5 seconds to leave, if you carefully watch the video, you will notice that the footage freezes completely and then resumes later, after I had already moved away to prepare myself for a possible fight. This means that parts of the video were cut or modified, which should not be allowed. Therefore, the video evidence is not complete and should not be considered valid.
I would also like to point out that the player was holding a weapon in his hands and appeared ready to engage in combat with me. During the incident, I killed him, while his second friend ran to their family house. There was also a third person with them, but I did not shoot him at all because he was not involved when they gave me the 5-second warning.
Furthermore, I still do not understand the reason for giving me 5 seconds to leave. I was not creating any danger or threat to them, and there was no valid reason for such a demand.
For these reasons, I respectfully ask a senior administrator to review this situation carefully. From what I can see, there are several issues with this report, including the apparent editing of the video evidence. Because of this, I believe the report should not have been accepted, yet it was somehow approved.
Thank you for taking the time to read my message. If I made any mistake during this situation, I would appreciate it if you could explain what rule I broke so that I can understand it better in the future.
I wish you all a great day.
