Rejected Ban For Targeting | Ryan Laswell

[mauro_only]

Dear Boby, I don’t know what they told you, but in the targeting thread we started, no one got banned—they just issued warnings. We posted nearly forty pieces of evidence, and the only response was a verbal warning. As for me, I was banned immediately without receiving any warning at all. Do you think this is fair? When it happened to them, they got a warning; when it happened to me, I got a ban—this is unfair. I’m standing up for my rights. Also, recently they opened a “mass rule break” forum for us, and in that forum, they posted our old POV requirements, and Frost said, ‘Your situation was different, theirs was different; you intentionally shot from outside the zone, while they weren’t intentionally shooting. Additionally, using forums that were created and reviewed before they became official as evidence could lead to you being penalized for “Targeting.”’
' Frost said all this, but I’m defending my rights. I’m getting banned without a warning, while they’re only receiving warnings despite having nearly forty pieces of evidence. You might have heard that both sides had equal evidence, but we saw their evidence—there were only four or five pieces at the time, while we had thirty, and they only received warnings. Among those pieces of evidence, two people committed “Occ Target,” yet they didn’t receive a ban for it Meanwhile, I’m getting a 30-day ban without even using OCC to target anyone, while they’re getting a warning with 30 pieces of evidence. This isn’t fair. Please don’t just kick people out of the game—take measures to address this.

 

[Bobby Pluxury]

Rejected

wait until the complaint agains the admin is reviewed and a response is given to, if the admin is found incorrect and punished for it, then your punishment will also be lifted and the warning was issued a long time ago to both families about this matter so no more warnings!