Rejected Miss-use of Corrupt Bio & Fail RP I 448954

[sleepygurlxo]

Hello,

I would like to appeal the rejection of my previous complaint:
Rejected - Miss-use of Corrupt Bio & Fail RP I 448954

The reason given for the rejection was:

Rejected

• There seems to be missing POV.
• POV does not show the whole situation.
• I do not see any abuse.

I respectfully disagree with this reasoning.

Missing POV​

I do not understand how the POV is considered incomplete.

The evidence I provided includes:

• POV from before I even arrived at the Black Market, showing I had no prior interaction with the officer.
• The entire interaction, beginning with the officer's first contact with me.
• The complete corrupt RP, including the bribe.
• The events afterwards where I was transported to another location, had a bag placed over my head, and was left stranded.
• The aftermath, showing I remained bagged for several minutes until another player eventually removed it.

There are no missing sections of the interaction.

To make this even clearer, I have included the additional POV again, showing I never ran from the officer before the encounter.

POV before the interaction:

Full interaction:

Abuse of Corrupt Bio​

I also disagree with the conclusion that there was no abuse.

The officer's approved Corrupt Bio states:

"No random targeting, must have IC reason."

My POV shows that our very first interaction was him immediately tasering and handcuffing me while I was getting into my vehicle.

There was:

• no prior conversation,
• no commands,
• no attempt to stop me,
• no RP leading up to the detention.

In his response, the officer stated that he assumed I had been involved in illegal activity simply because I was leaving the Black Market.

An assumption alone is not an IC reason, particularly when no crime had been witnessed and I had not interacted with him beforehand.

He also claimed I attempted to run from him.

This is directly contradicted by the additional POV, which clearly shows I was simply walking towards my own vehicle before any interaction took place.

Events After the Bribe​

Even if the corrupt stop itself is considered valid, I believe the events after the bribe demonstrate abuse.

Once I transferred the agreed $100,000, the corrupt officer had already received the financial benefit that his Corrupt Bio allows.

Despite this, he then:

• transported me to a second location,
• placed a bag over my head,
• fired a weapon beside me,
• forced me to run away,
• and abandoned me while still bagged.

These actions provided no additional benefit to the corrupt officer and appeared to be carried out solely to humiliate and inconvenience my character.

I fail to see how this falls within the intended use of a Corrupt Bio.

Request​

I am simply asking for this complaint to be reviewed again, as I believe the rejection was based on an incorrect understanding of the evidence provided.

If there is a specific part of the interaction that staff believe is missing, I would appreciate clarification, because from my perspective the complete incident has been provided from before the encounter until after it had concluded.

 

[Kayess Exe]

Reviewing…​

 

[Kayess Exe]

Rejected

There is no Abuse of Biography in this situation.
​