Rejected Corruption | Lui Alcapone

[EnzoWhite]

Hello Lebron, I am writing to file another complaint regarding admin corruption, specifically concerning the FIB leader. The admin in question, Lui Alcapone, hadn't touched any forum complaints for three hours. However, the exact minute I posted my complaint, he immediately jumped online and rejected it, claiming the leader didn't break any rules. From what I know, an organization leader is required to show their identification, and this individual was actively on duty as an FIB officer. This situation feels incredibly unfair. How can an admin who isn't even the FIB curator conveniently show up the second I post, just to dismiss a valid complaint against a leader? This is completely absurd and needs to be looked into. Here are is a fact surrounding this issue:
The Inactivity vs. Targeted Complaints: Admin Lui Alcapone had not processed a single forum complaint for over three hours. Yet within sixty seconds of my complaint going live he suddenly became active solely to reject it. This immediate intervention points toward biased complaint reviews.
It seems like no matter what certain people will always be treated better by the system even if they break rules.

 

[EnzoWhite]

To add a crucial fact regarding the evidence provided my recording captures the entire interaction from start to finish. I only stopped the recording the exact second the other person present stated that the individual was not there. At that point, no further roleplay or interaction could physically take place, meaning the clip captures the full and complete violation.

 

[Lebron Pluxury]

For Abraham or Nixa

 

[Nixa Simba]

Odbijeno, mozda je otisao AFK u taj momenat samim tim potreban je duzi snimak. Admin ce dobiti kaznu za rijesavanje zalbe na lidera za kojeg nije kurator