- Joined
- Apr 16, 2022
- Messages
- 2,140
Icly we made a subpeona which was signed by the supreme court judge shown in the pov above. ( 10112022-DOJ-SC-A01 ) in this subpeona you can clearly see a certain time frame it was signed by the judge on accordance to the case we were actively working on. we asked for the time frame of when he first interacted with me to the point of me getting my laywers license revoked. none of the requirements were met. the supreme court judge stands there and says that the evidence provided was enough when it was not.
evidence provided nowhere near reaching any of the requirements of the subpeona :
you can also hear in the video i provided that the judge goes on to say " you want the bodycam to hear the women on the radio" (MG based of my previous forum "Rejected - POV Request | ID 93" icly there is no way he could have known this is what i was after. Unless of course the person on the radio advised him or other employees not to show this part making it entirely corruption in gov still however mg as the only time this was brought up was on the forum post.
the judge knew what we were after knew what we needed it for and still told us "the evidence is sufficient" when clearly as shown the evidence provided shows nothing of what happened the reason for black list the blackisting and the revocation of the lawyers license. the judge knows and signed off on the subpeona making him corrupt without a bio for doing nothing about it simply because the person or persons involved are all part of gov.
evidence provided nowhere near reaching any of the requirements of the subpeona :
you can also hear in the video i provided that the judge goes on to say " you want the bodycam to hear the women on the radio" (MG based of my previous forum "Rejected - POV Request | ID 93" icly there is no way he could have known this is what i was after. Unless of course the person on the radio advised him or other employees not to show this part making it entirely corruption in gov still however mg as the only time this was brought up was on the forum post.
the judge knew what we were after knew what we needed it for and still told us "the evidence is sufficient" when clearly as shown the evidence provided shows nothing of what happened the reason for black list the blackisting and the revocation of the lawyers license. the judge knows and signed off on the subpeona making him corrupt without a bio for doing nothing about it simply because the person or persons involved are all part of gov.
