Evidence seem to be inadequate for admin intervention except ID 35538's minor breech of Non-RP.
Evidence from link
Shows perfectly fine RP Scenario until 0:42
Did ID 9354 FIB officer said/display his badge number and name before requesting for suspect's information?
Even if he did not. It is an IC Issue not a RP issue. This IC Issue cannot be used as evidence against ID 9354 of the above organizational rule unless it have shown parties had RP bodycam.
If this IC information/evidence is used against ID 9354. It will be a breech of Metagaming (MG) as there are no IC Roleplay of bodycam evidence. > Rule Broken:
- N/A, Resume RP.
ID 35538 Minor Breech of Non-RP via IC Voice at 0:43 ID 35538 should not use voice to convey the Non-RP message at 0:43 where he used IC Voice to say OOC "ohhhh, ban, this is ban, easy ban"
ID 35538 should use Non-RP Chatbox and tell other party to look at the left eye instead. > Rule Broken: - Non-RP- Doing things that are considered not sufficient to be considered good standard roleplay depending on the situation at hand.e.g running around a crime scene for no reason, dancing and screaming in a troll manner in a serious situation, not roleplaying fear appropriately in situations realistically.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.