Reviewed Metagaming | Goverment

[Liam Vercetti]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1035906237214249016/1079475275609423942/Subpoena_Clarko_Verlice.pdf

So dear Admins what you see here is metagaming they used Player "Clarko Verlice"s ID 9k something to get his name in a subpoena IC Document (U can see the document does not include anything sorts of ways they identified it was clarko so clearly they are metagaming)​

 

[Liam Vercetti]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1035906237214249016/1079475275609423942/Subpoena_Clarko_Verlice.pdf

​

So dear Admins what you see here is metagaming they used Player "Clarko Verlice"s ID 9k something to get his name in a subpoena IC Document (U can see the document does not include anything sorts of ways they identified it was clarko so clearly they are metagaming)​

Also I thought targeting other organizations results in leader blacklist

I really hate to do this to lavi as it is people who did something wrong but yeah

 

[Dray San]

You literally showed your bodycam to us in Doj room 1. Or are you stating that your own bodycam is invalid?

 

[Dray San]

Oh and if you looked at the evidence provided.. You clearly hear Vito Bulut say: I heard his name, and I recognised his voice.

 

[Lavi Pluxury]

Also I thought targeting other organizations results in leader blacklist

I really hate to do this to lavi as it is people who did something wrong but yeah

Never targeted any orgs, I support DOJ and other orgs as well but where you are wrong I will support DOJ.
If I wanted to target any org, I would spend time making a CASE FILE with DOJ, but no, I would never target anyone no matter what they do.

Just wanted to say this, thank you

 

[Liam Vercetti]

Never targeted any orgs, I support DOJ and other orgs as well but where you are wrong I will support DOJ.
If I wanted to target any org, I would spend time making a CASE FILE with DOJ, but no, I would never target anyone no matter what they do.

Just wanted to say this, thank you

Like I said never said you did, DOJ Does though Only SAHP Because I didnt let their Lawyer Go after he commicted a crime lol so they target us

 

[Liam Vercetti]

Oh and if you looked at the evidence provided.. You clearly hear Vito Bulut say: I heard his name, and I recognised his voice.

Recognised his voice trough a mask? Also in DOJ Room 1 I also said I think thats clarko and at the time I was sure thats clarko but then clarko did say that he was not there and that litteruly every gang unit wears that uniform, Dont lie it is meta we all know it

 

[Liam Vercetti]

Like I said never said you did, DOJ Does though Only SAHP Because I didnt let their Lawyer Go after he commicted a crime lol so they target us

Also I think because the AG might be friends with the Charon family who we hurt trough our actions boo hoo, so they do everything to make our job hard and impossible (Namely to work as an organization)

 

[Dray San]

1st of all, its a subpoena. It doesnt need bodycam or what ever you are used to. The testimony is enough. He stated that he heard the name of Clarko and recognised his voice.

Its not about the DOJ room anyway. Its a subpoena for bodycam.

You are clearly acting out of emotions, mostly anger.

I would advise you to just continue the RP and provide the bodycam ICly. And drop this whole forum post. Cause this is clearly just you being angry and mad.

 

[Liam Vercetti]

1st of all, its a subpoena. It doesnt need bodycam or what ever you are used to. The testimony is enough. He stated that he heard the name of Clarko and recognised his voice.

Its not about the DOJ room anyway. Its a subpoena for bodycam.

You are clearly acting out of emotions, mostly anger.

I would advise you to just continue the RP and provide the bodycam ICly. And drop this whole forum post. Cause this is clearly just you being angry and mad.

Nope its me fighting against Metagaming and RP That is poor quality and thats the least hurtful word, about anger I dont display that at the end of the day it is a video game the only reason I could be angry is if you do something OOC Because thats not part of the game anymore and I think metagaming someone s ID To put them in a subpoena is pretty much an OOC Thing.

 

[Sophia Queen]

Reviewing​

 

[Sophia Queen]

Reviewed

This all seems like an ic situation, personally I don't see any MG being involved in this and it could be handled icly instead of going ooc.​