Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
285589
Players nickname
Angelica Dunleavy
Administrators nickname
Syndra Lovinhood
Date
May 27, 2023
Time
0:16
Proofs
https://youtu.be/acOYi38q24M

Ashtrayy

Player
Player
Joined
May 13, 2023
Messages
47
so i was at subs nd saw my lovely fam members taking a photo so i decided to join in. so as i always do i emoted for the picture nd was finna post it on emails but not much longer i got banned for GR 6.8 but as you can see there was no body where we were standing. there was also no intent to be emoting ontop of a body as i was jus doing it for the picture.
 

Billy theeKid

Player
Player
Joined
Apr 19, 2023
Messages
15
This ban seems really unfair.

6.8 It is restricted to do any amoral actions in relation to an unconscious person(e.g. spitting, sexual animations and etc) | BAN 3-7 days

The emote he did was not in relation to any unconscious persons as the video shows it was clearly for a picture with friends. You can see there was no unconscious persons in the framing of the picture that was taken even. Ashtrayy is a respectful guy.. he would never emote on a dead body so its crazy he got a ban for this picture. Please reconsider, thanks.
 

Vultrix1

Player
Player
Joined
Apr 5, 2023
Messages
40
Didn't look intentional or disrespectful it was clearly a family photo in my opinion should be reconsidered can even see in the clip when he took a screenshot he took the picture and removed the body so it was just a family photo I dont see how this violates any rule.
 

Timmy Bottom

Player
Player
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
Messages
11
  • GR 6.8 It is restricted to do any amoral actions in relation to an unconscious person(e.g. spitting, sexual animations and etc)

    Him emoting was not in relation to an unconscious person nor was it intended for it to be. Simply emoted, took a picture with friends and fam in which the person wasnt even in the picture, then immediately uploaded it to ingrand.

    Please reconsider!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom