- Joined
- Sep 4, 2022
- Messages
- 1,076
Hello Bobby,
I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to bring to your attention an incident that occurred recently in the ghetto. We engaged with law enforcement officers (LEOs), took them hostage, and proceeded to a store where we had two additional hostages. Subsequently, I went to fill a helicopter with supplies for our use and to access the trunk for more items.
During this time, I observed three members of our organization being penalized for violating event rule 1.12. Upon inquiring, they explained that they had three hostages, even though we hadn't initiated the store robbery yet. Confused, I asked a friend for details, and he stated, "I don't know; I just joined the game and found three hostages. I requested IDs to release one, and Kareem issued a warning to three people."
I was disheartened by this situation, as conducting a store robbery is challenging, and it felt discouraging to face consequences without the administration acknowledging our efforts or informing us of the need to release a hostage. It would have been more constructive if the admins had communicated that we had three hostages and needed to release one, even if we were planning to do so.
Moreover, the rule dictates that a crime organization needs four individuals involved in a rule break to warrant punishment. In this case, I witnessed only three individuals being penalized, yet Kareem issued a warning to our organization within a minute. I kindly request that you, as a higher admin, investigate this matter and ensure fairness in the handling of such situations. (4 members shall be breaking a rule to receive a org punishment not 3)
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Shabah Verlice.
I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to bring to your attention an incident that occurred recently in the ghetto. We engaged with law enforcement officers (LEOs), took them hostage, and proceeded to a store where we had two additional hostages. Subsequently, I went to fill a helicopter with supplies for our use and to access the trunk for more items.
During this time, I observed three members of our organization being penalized for violating event rule 1.12. Upon inquiring, they explained that they had three hostages, even though we hadn't initiated the store robbery yet. Confused, I asked a friend for details, and he stated, "I don't know; I just joined the game and found three hostages. I requested IDs to release one, and Kareem issued a warning to three people."
I was disheartened by this situation, as conducting a store robbery is challenging, and it felt discouraging to face consequences without the administration acknowledging our efforts or informing us of the need to release a hostage. It would have been more constructive if the admins had communicated that we had three hostages and needed to release one, even if we were planning to do so.
Moreover, the rule dictates that a crime organization needs four individuals involved in a rule break to warrant punishment. In this case, I witnessed only three individuals being penalized, yet Kareem issued a warning to our organization within a minute. I kindly request that you, as a higher admin, investigate this matter and ensure fairness in the handling of such situations. (4 members shall be breaking a rule to receive a org punishment not 3)
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Shabah Verlice.
