Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
97283
Players nickname
Arthur Martin
Administrators nickname
Joey Marsh
Date
Jan 25, 2025
Time
00:00
Proofs
https://imgur.com/a/U0rK8jO

999zxp_

Player
Player
Joined
Jul 9, 2024
Messages
37
Subject: Formal Appeal for Review of Ban Decision

Dear Administartion Team,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to formally appeal the ban decision related to the recent RP situation, specifically the accusation of deceiving an admin. I fully accept any consequences for my actions within the RP scenario, but I would like to respectfully request a review of the decision, as I believe there may have been a misunderstanding.

Key Points for Review:

  1. No Intent to Deceive:
    In my forum response Reviewed - GR 6.15 + CR | 103686 + 101204 + 57205, I stated that I was genuinely leaving the situation alone and had no intention of provoking or annoying others. My actions were consistent with my RP character as a state employee, and I made no attempts to deceive anyone.
  2. Escalation of the Situation:
    • At the beginning of the interaction, I intended to escort the individuals as part of my RP role. However, they initiated ramming (as seen in the video at 2:45 and 2:57, where a radio message explicitly instructs them to stop ramming).
    • At 4:50 in the video, demands were made while I was driving at high speed, which made it impractical to comply immediately.
  3. VDM Incident:
    • In both the GOV POV
      and my POV
      , it is evident that I attempted to avoid collisions multiple times. However, the GOV agents stopped in the middle of the road, which is an unusual and unsafe action for their RP roles.
    • At 8:00 in the GOV POV, the collision appears to be a result of a bug or an issue with illegal redux, as shown in my POV.
  4. GR 6.4 Violation:
    I respectfully disagree with the accusation of breaking GR 6.4. My actions were consistent with my RP character, and there is no evidence to suggest I was playing against my role.

Conclusion:

I kindly request the reviewing admin to re-examine the evidence, including the videos and my forum response, to assess whether the ban for deceiving an admin is justified. I believe there is no intent to deceive, and my actions were in line with the RP scenario.

Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. I appreciate your understanding and consideration.

Sincerely,
Arthur Martin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom