Respected Admin,
Player 82827 recently filed a forum report against me for RDM, claiming that he was only at the location to complete a Stranger task and that I killed him without any valid reason. I would like to respectfully clarify the situation.
Firstly, I admit that I killed him without making any demands, and I fully accept that it was my mistake. I also immediately patched him afterward, realizing the error.
However, the player’s forum post appears misleading. He stated that he only came for the Stranger task, yet in the second POV (from my side), he can clearly be seen already dead inside the weed farm, killed by my friend. This indicates that his presence there might not have been as innocent as he claimed.
If he truly came just to complete a task, and I had already patched him right after the incident, why did he not proceed with the task instead of remaining there or dying again in a hostile situation? This inconsistency suggests that he might have submitted a short or incomplete POV to mislead the admin team and have me punished unfairly.
I truly appreciate the admin team’s efforts and professionalism. I am grateful that his forum was rejected due to insufficient POV. Grand RP is a great platform, and I hope we can continue maintaining fairness by discouraging such deceptive reports.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
Best regards,
Mikey Flawless | 130686
Player 82827 recently filed a forum report against me for RDM, claiming that he was only at the location to complete a Stranger task and that I killed him without any valid reason. I would like to respectfully clarify the situation.
Firstly, I admit that I killed him without making any demands, and I fully accept that it was my mistake. I also immediately patched him afterward, realizing the error.
However, the player’s forum post appears misleading. He stated that he only came for the Stranger task, yet in the second POV (from my side), he can clearly be seen already dead inside the weed farm, killed by my friend. This indicates that his presence there might not have been as innocent as he claimed.
If he truly came just to complete a task, and I had already patched him right after the incident, why did he not proceed with the task instead of remaining there or dying again in a hostile situation? This inconsistency suggests that he might have submitted a short or incomplete POV to mislead the admin team and have me punished unfairly.
I truly appreciate the admin team’s efforts and professionalism. I am grateful that his forum was rejected due to insufficient POV. Grand RP is a great platform, and I hope we can continue maintaining fairness by discouraging such deceptive reports.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
Best regards,
Mikey Flawless | 130686
