Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
71927
Players nickname
Farouk Flood
Suspect ID
59
Date of violation
May 13, 2025
Time of violation
16:31
Proofs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuRNtE6H2sI

faroukMahmoud

Player
Player
Joined
Feb 20, 2024
Messages
29
Complaint Regarding Inconsistent Rule Enforcement and Clarification on Hostage Scenarios

To: Grand RP Administration Team
Subject: Urgent Clarification and Fair Enforcement of Hostage Scenario Rules

Dear Administrators,

I am writing to formally address concerns about inconsistent rule enforcement and unclear guidelines regarding hostage/ransom roleplay scenarios. These issues arose during discussions on 17.05.2025 between myself (Farouk Flood) and administrators Abhiijet Burrows and Ismail Loco. The lack of clarity has caused confusion and frustration, undermining trust in the fairness of the server’s governance.

Key Concerns:
Contradictory Rule Enforcement

Admin Abhiijet Burrows explicitly stated, “official fam cannot take a hostage,” yet content creator Mamkalo allegedly executed a similar hostage scenario in a YouTube video without repercussions. This inconsistency suggests selective enforcement of rules, which unfairly disadvantages ordinary players.

Ambiguity in LEO Involvement

While admins emphasized that only LEOs (LSPD, SAHP, FIB) should handle ransom negotiations, there was no clarity on:

Consequences for bypassing LEOs.

Procedures if a hostage claims no one cares about them (resulting in threats of in-character death).

This ambiguity leaves players at risk of unintentional rule-breaking.

Unprofessional Administrative Responses

When seeking clarification, I was instructed to “make a forum with your POV” instead of receiving direct answers.

Admin Shashank Jain’s vague reply (“yes u can”) to a question about complaint categories further exacerbated confusion.

Requested Actions:
Immediate Rule Clarification abou

Consequences for rule violations, including ransom demands without LEO involvement.

Investigate Mamkalo’s Case

Review the referenced YouTube video to determine if rules were violated. If so, apply appropriate penalties to ensure fairness and transparency.

Staff Accountability and Training

Address unprofessional behavior (e.g., dismissive or vague responses) to rebuild player trust.

Strict Penalties for Future Violations

Enforce standardized punishments for players and admins who disregard or misapply rules, ensuring no one is exempt from accountability.

Conclusion
This inconsistency in rule enforcement and administrative communication harms the integrity of Grand RP. I urge you to resolve these issues promptly to maintain a fair and enjoyable environment for all players.

Sincerely,
Farouk Flood
Date: 17.05.2025

Note: This complaint is submitted in good faith to improve the server’s governance. I await your response and action.
 

lokmane kastor

Player
Player
Joined
Feb 27, 2022
Messages
211
Complaint Regarding Inconsistent Rule Enforcement and Clarification on Hostage Scenarios

To: Grand RP Administration Team
Subject: Urgent Clarification and Fair Enforcement of Hostage Scenario Rules

Dear Administrators,

I am writing to formally address concerns about inconsistent rule enforcement and unclear guidelines regarding hostage/ransom roleplay scenarios. These issues arose during discussions on 17.05.2025 between myself (Farouk Flood) and administrators Abhiijet Burrows and Ismail Loco. The lack of clarity has caused confusion and frustration, undermining trust in the fairness of the server’s governance.

Key Concerns:
Contradictory Rule Enforcement

Admin Abhiijet Burrows explicitly stated, “official fam cannot take a hostage,” yet content creator Mamkalo allegedly executed a similar hostage scenario in a YouTube video without repercussions. This inconsistency suggests selective enforcement of rules, which unfairly disadvantages ordinary players.

Ambiguity in LEO Involvement

While admins emphasized that only LEOs (LSPD, SAHP, FIB) should handle ransom negotiations, there was no clarity on:

Consequences for bypassing LEOs.

Procedures if a hostage claims no one cares about them (resulting in threats of in-character death).

This ambiguity leaves players at risk of unintentional rule-breaking.

Unprofessional Administrative Responses

When seeking clarification, I was instructed to “make a forum with your POV” instead of receiving direct answers.

Admin Shashank Jain’s vague reply (“yes u can”) to a question about complaint categories further exacerbated confusion.

Requested Actions:
Immediate Rule Clarification abou

Consequences for rule violations, including ransom demands without LEO involvement.

Investigate Mamkalo’s Case

Review the referenced YouTube video to determine if rules were violated. If so, apply appropriate penalties to ensure fairness and transparency.

Staff Accountability and Training

Address unprofessional behavior (e.g., dismissive or vague responses) to rebuild player trust.

Strict Penalties for Future Violations

Enforce standardized punishments for players and admins who disregard or misapply rules, ensuring no one is exempt from accountability.

Conclusion
This inconsistency in rule enforcement and administrative communication harms the integrity of Grand RP. I urge you to resolve these issues promptly to maintain a fair and enjoyable environment for all players.

Sincerely,
Farouk Flood
Date: 17.05.2025

Note: This complaint is submitted in good faith to improve the server’s governance. I await your response and action.
you targeting him ?what u mean he is streamer he can do any situation . do u have problem with him?
 

Abhijeet Burrows

Newbie
Player
Joined
Feb 6, 2024
Messages
2,213
Rejected

You are not related to the situation
only the person involved in the situation can make a complaint.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom