- Joined
- Aug 23, 2025
- Messages
- 43
Hello Bobby/Floki/Adham,
This is not IC issue as the Governor himself doing corruption.
I hope you are doing well. I recently raised a complaint regarding the rejection of my case file, but the Curator is not engaging with the actual issue I explained and is not addressing the rule interpretation I raised. Due to this, the matter is being stalled without proper clarification.
My concern is broader than just one rejection. If the DOJ and the Governor are always treated as incapable of wrongdoing or corruption, and any attempt to question their actions is dismissed at the initial stage, then meaningful roleplay and accountability cannot function. Oversight bodies like IRB exist specifically to investigate such situations, not to assume correctness before investigation.
I am not alleging corruption as a fact. I am stating that investigation and review must be allowed when reasonable grounds are presented. If case files calling for investigation are rejected without proper rule-based reasoning, it removes checks and balances from the system.
I request you guys to review how this matter has been handled, why the raised points are not being addressed, and whether current practice is preventing accountability roleplay from functioning as intended.
The Case File and the Proof is already provided in Trent's DMs.
This is not IC issue as the Governor himself doing corruption.
I hope you are doing well. I recently raised a complaint regarding the rejection of my case file, but the Curator is not engaging with the actual issue I explained and is not addressing the rule interpretation I raised. Due to this, the matter is being stalled without proper clarification.
My concern is broader than just one rejection. If the DOJ and the Governor are always treated as incapable of wrongdoing or corruption, and any attempt to question their actions is dismissed at the initial stage, then meaningful roleplay and accountability cannot function. Oversight bodies like IRB exist specifically to investigate such situations, not to assume correctness before investigation.
I am not alleging corruption as a fact. I am stating that investigation and review must be allowed when reasonable grounds are presented. If case files calling for investigation are rejected without proper rule-based reasoning, it removes checks and balances from the system.
I request you guys to review how this matter has been handled, why the raised points are not being addressed, and whether current practice is preventing accountability roleplay from functioning as intended.
The Case File and the Proof is already provided in Trent's DMs.
