Rejected Appeal for Warning (RDM + MG) – ID 103049

[Samet Chivas]

Subject: Request for Review of Warning (ID 103049)

Dear Grand RP Administration,

I would like to respectfully request a review of the warning issued to my account (ID 103049).

In the reported situation, I went with another player to the money printing machine area with the intention of taking it over. As soon as we arrived, another group of players started shooting at us without any prior interaction or valid in-character reason.

In response to being attacked, I defended myself by returning fire. My actions were purely reactive and based on survival in that situation. I did not initiate any random deathmatch.

Regarding the MG accusation, I would like to clearly state that I did not use any out-of-character information at any point during this situation. All actions were based solely on in-game roleplay.

After reviewing the rules, I understand how my actions may have been interpreted differently, but there was no intention to break server rules or ruin roleplay.

I respectfully ask for a reconsideration of this warning, as the situation appears to be self-defense rather than intentional rule violation.

Thank you for your time and understanding.

Best regards,
ID 103049

 

[Floki Vilgeroarson]

IMPORTANT - Rules for filing complaints against administrators and Assistants / Section Rules

Rules for filing a complaint: The topic should be designed strictly according to the form; The topic title should briefly describe the essence of the problem and the nickname of the administrator who issued the penalty (otherwise, the checking administrator has the right to refuse to consider...

gta5grand.com