Rejected Kizule Macakk | For Mazhor Pluxury

[Glushe]

Dear Mazhor Pluxury,
I am writing this complaint directly to you because I strongly believe there is a case of selective justice and administrator bias happening on the RS server regarding my recent punishment. I was punished for "Fear RP" in the Ghetto area, based on a 10-second clip or speculation by the administrator Kizule Macakk.

However, the administrator completely ignored the fact that the group of players targeted me and baited me out of a safe zone into the yellow ghetto through deceit, purely to abuse the ghetto script and rob my Assault Rifle. When I tried to explain that I was a victim of heavy "Baiting" and "Fail RP", the administrator refused to investigate the beginning of the situation and told me, "If you have a POV, post it on the forum."

This clearly indicates that the administrator himself does not possess a full POV of how the RP situation initiated, yet he decided to hand out a punishment based on a fragmented context. It feels like the administration team here is selectively punishing players while protecting certain groups who abuse server mechanics (like baiting into the ghetto).

An administrator should remain impartial, not act like a shield for rule-breakers. Since local management often protects their staff, I am requesting you to personally review this case and demand the full POV from the administrator.

It will clearly show that he specated only the very end of the situation and made an unfair, biased judgment. Thank you for your time and for keeping the Grand RP project fair.

 

[Glushe]

Detailed Statement of the Event: Comprehensive Breakdown​

Dear Project Management,

To ensure a completely transparent review of this case, I am providing a meticulous, phase-by-phase breakdown of the event. This statement covers the psychological manipulation by the players, my legitimate reaction, and the absolute failure of administrative protocol by the handling administrator.

Phase 1: The Premeditated Trap & Script Abuse (The Players' Violation)​

The entire situation was fundamentally illegitimate from the very beginning. I did not organically wander into a dangerous area looking for a fight; I was systematically targeted.

• Deceit in a Safe Zone: A group of players approached me outside of the ghetto, in a neutral/safe environment. Using deceit and false pretenses—pretending they wanted to trade, talk, or interact normally—they lured me into accompanying them.
• Weaponizing Zone Mechanics (Baiting): These players knew that if they attempted to rob my Assault Rifle in a standard zone, they would be bound by General Rule 6.16, requiring at least 2 vehicles and 4 people. To bypass this server rule, they deliberately manipulated me into crossing the threshold into the Yellow Ghetto (Danger Zone).
• The Intent: This was not an organic Roleplay encounter. This was a calculated, skam-like operation designed to exploit the script mechanics of the yellow ghetto to strip me of a high-value weapon. In Grand RP, pulling a player out of a safe environment through fraud just to force them into a high-risk zone for financial gain is the exact definition of Baiting and Powergaming.

Phase 2: The Ambush & The Breakdown of the RP Context​

The moment we crossed into the yellow ghetto, the trap snapped shut. The players immediately pulled out heavy weaponry, aimed at my head, and demanded that I drop my Assault Rifle.

• My Reaction vs. Fear RP: The administrator hastily concluded that my hesitation to drop the weapon was a violation of "Fear RP" (not valuing my life). This is a completely superficial analysis. My hesitation was not an act of defiance against their weapons; it was a complete psychological breakdown of the RP context.
• The Victim's Dilemma: I instantly realized I had been completely meta-gamed and baited. When a Roleplay scenario is built entirely on a foundation of rule breaks (Fail RP), the victim is placed in an impossible dilemma: comply with corrupt players and permanently lose a valuable item, or freeze out of pure shock because the entire situation is illegal. I chose to freeze because the action taking place was inherently against the spirit and rules of the server.

Phase 3: The Administrator’s Procedural Malpractice (The 10-Second Spec)​

This is the core of my complaint against the administrator. He did not act as an impartial judge; he acted with severe tunnel vision.

• Lack of Context: The administrator did not witness the baiting, the conversation in the safe zone, or our journey into the ghetto. He likely opened his spectator tool in the final 10 seconds of the encounter. He saw a single isolated frame: guns pointed at a player who wasn't moving.
• Lazy Judging: Instead of conducting a proper investigation, checking logs, or asking how the scenario initiated, he took the path of least resistance. He punished me—the easiest target—simply because clipping a player standing still is easier than investigating a complex, pre-planned rule violation by a group.
• Shifting the Burden of Proof: When I confronted him about the baiting, his exact words were: "If you have a POV, post it on the forum." This single sentence is an explicit admission of guilt by the administrator. He openly admitted that he does not know how the situation started. Per administrative protocol, an administrator is strictly forbidden from handing out definitive punishments if they did not witness the initiation of the RP scenario. Punishing a reaction while being entirely blind to the illegal provocation is a severe violation of an admin's duties.

Phase 4: Selective Enforcement & The "Mafia" Dynamic​

What turns this from a simple mistake into a case of administrative bias is the selective nature of the justice served on this server.

• Protecting the Aggressors: The administrator completely turned a blind eye to the blatant Baiting and Fail RP committed by this group. By hiding behind the technicality of "Ghetto rules," he essentially legitimized a corrupt, rule-breaking setup, acting as a protective shield for toxic players so they could successfully steal my weapon.
• A Call for True Administration: An administrator is supposed to be an ADMINISTRATOR—an impartial, objective guardian of the server rules. They are not supposed to behave like a mafia protector who shields a specific clique of players while aggressively throwing the victims into Demorgan by selective, short-sighted enforcement.

• *Text is curated with AI so I put out all my words more effectively and you have a better understanding of the situation.

 

[Pablo Schmidt]

Rejected
Incorrect section. This section is en2​